What Actually Happened to Celebrity Fragrance

Bottle of 08 Beyond The Horizon extrait de parfum with white label and black square cap

The standard account goes like this. Celebrity fragrance was cynical, cheap and bad. Consumers got wise. It died. Good.

The numbers say something different, and it's more interesting than the story.

The boom was enormous

Elizabeth Taylor's White Diamonds launched in 1991 and was not the first celebrity fragrance, but it was the one that proved the model. Total sales reached roughly $1.5 billion by 2018. In 2010 alone it grossed $61.3 million — the most successful celebrity fragrance ever made, nineteen years after launch.

Taylor was genuinely involved, which the later imitators mostly weren't. But the lesson the industry took was not be involved. It was a famous name moves units, and for about twenty years it did.

At the peak in 2011, celebrity scents were doing around $150 million a year in the US, roughly four per cent of the prestige fragrance market.

Then it fell off a cliff

By 2014, three years later, the category was at about $50.6 million — under two per cent of a $3 billion market. It lost two-thirds of its volume in three years.

That is not a gradual decline in taste. Taste doesn't move that fast. That's a structural failure.

The actual cause was retail

Celebrity fragrance was a department store product. That was the entire distribution model: a name recognisable enough to work from twelve feet away, at a price point that made sense as a gift, in a channel where a shopper walked past a counter without intending to buy perfume.

Then the 2007 recession hit prestige fragrance hard, and department stores never really recovered. Younger and more diverse customers moved away from that channel entirely. The counter that celebrity fragrance depended on stopped having people standing in front of it.

Everything else people blame — flanker fatigue, thin juice, the sheer number of launches — was real, and none of it was new. Those things were true during the boom too. What changed was the shelf.

This is worth sitting with, because it's how most things in this industry actually work. The reason a category rises or falls is usually less about the liquid than anyone in the community wants to believe.

And then it came back

The revival is the part the sneering account can't explain at all.

Ariana Grande launched Ari with Luxe Brands in 2015 — at the very bottom of the crash — and did around $150 million in global sales within two years. One artist matching what the entire category had managed at its peak.

She did it without the counter. Social media replaced the department store as the discovery mechanism, and it turned out to be a better one for this specific product: a celebrity fragrance is a fragrance sold on the strength of a relationship with a person, and the platforms where that relationship already lives are more efficient than a shopping mall.

The category didn't die of shame. It lost its distribution and found a new one.

The bit that should make enthusiasts uncomfortable

Here's the awkward part, and we say it as a niche house that benefits from the opposite belief.

Celebrity fragrance and niche fragrance are doing the same thing. Both sell a bottle on the strength of a story attached to a person or a world. Both ask you to buy access to a sensibility. The difference is which sensibility you find flattering.

A Le Labo city exclusive and a pop star's signature scent are both context sold at a margin. One is coded as taste and one is coded as fandom, and the coding is doing more work than the composition in both cases.

That's not an argument that they're equally good. Plenty of licensed celebrity juice is genuinely mediocre, made to a price, by a brief that specified "smells expensive" and nothing else. But "it's marketing" is not the distinguishing criticism people think it is, because the alternative on offer is also marketing.

What's actually changed in the product

The current generation is measurably more serious than the 2008 vintage. Perfumers get credited. Concentrations are higher. Briefs are less obviously written by a licensing committee. Some of these are collaborations in the real sense — the artist in the room, making decisions — rather than a name rented for a season.

Which brings it back to the only question worth asking about any fragrance, celebrity or niche or designer: did somebody decide anything?

You can smell the answer. A composition where choices were made has edges — a material that's slightly too much, a transition that's abrupt, something that won't please everyone. A composition assembled to test well has none of that, and it doesn't matter whose face is on the box.

How to actually judge one

Smell it without the name, if you can manage it. Get a sample, wear it for a day, and notice whether you'd have been interested if it had arrived unlabelled from a house you'd never heard of.

Most won't survive that test. Some will, and they'll be better than things you paid four times as much for. We wrote about the cost of buying fragrance you haven't smelled — the reverse error is refusing to smell something because of what's printed on it, and it's cheaper but no less limiting.

Chapter One is currently sold out. Join the list to be notified first.

Journal Celebrity fragrance

What Actually Happened to Celebrity Fragrance

Celebrity scent went from $150m a year to a third of that in three years, then came back. The collapse wasn't about taste — it was about where perfume was sold.

5 min read

Bottle of 08 Beyond The Horizon extrait de parfum with white label and black square cap

The standard account goes like this. Celebrity fragrance was cynical, cheap and bad. Consumers got wise. It died. Good.

The numbers say something different, and it's more interesting than the story.

The boom was enormous

Elizabeth Taylor's White Diamonds launched in 1991 and was not the first celebrity fragrance, but it was the one that proved the model. Total sales reached roughly $1.5 billion by 2018. In 2010 alone it grossed $61.3 million — the most successful celebrity fragrance ever made, nineteen years after launch.

Taylor was genuinely involved, which the later imitators mostly weren't. But the lesson the industry took was not be involved. It was a famous name moves units, and for about twenty years it did.

At the peak in 2011, celebrity scents were doing around $150 million a year in the US, roughly four per cent of the prestige fragrance market.

Then it fell off a cliff

By 2014, three years later, the category was at about $50.6 million — under two per cent of a $3 billion market. It lost two-thirds of its volume in three years.

That is not a gradual decline in taste. Taste doesn't move that fast. That's a structural failure.

The actual cause was retail

Celebrity fragrance was a department store product. That was the entire distribution model: a name recognisable enough to work from twelve feet away, at a price point that made sense as a gift, in a channel where a shopper walked past a counter without intending to buy perfume.

Then the 2007 recession hit prestige fragrance hard, and department stores never really recovered. Younger and more diverse customers moved away from that channel entirely. The counter that celebrity fragrance depended on stopped having people standing in front of it.

Everything else people blame — flanker fatigue, thin juice, the sheer number of launches — was real, and none of it was new. Those things were true during the boom too. What changed was the shelf.

This is worth sitting with, because it's how most things in this industry actually work. The reason a category rises or falls is usually less about the liquid than anyone in the community wants to believe.

And then it came back

The revival is the part the sneering account can't explain at all.

Ariana Grande launched Ari with Luxe Brands in 2015 — at the very bottom of the crash — and did around $150 million in global sales within two years. One artist matching what the entire category had managed at its peak.

She did it without the counter. Social media replaced the department store as the discovery mechanism, and it turned out to be a better one for this specific product: a celebrity fragrance is a fragrance sold on the strength of a relationship with a person, and the platforms where that relationship already lives are more efficient than a shopping mall.

The category didn't die of shame. It lost its distribution and found a new one.

The bit that should make enthusiasts uncomfortable

Here's the awkward part, and we say it as a niche house that benefits from the opposite belief.

Celebrity fragrance and niche fragrance are doing the same thing. Both sell a bottle on the strength of a story attached to a person or a world. Both ask you to buy access to a sensibility. The difference is which sensibility you find flattering.

A Le Labo city exclusive and a pop star's signature scent are both context sold at a margin. One is coded as taste and one is coded as fandom, and the coding is doing more work than the composition in both cases.

That's not an argument that they're equally good. Plenty of licensed celebrity juice is genuinely mediocre, made to a price, by a brief that specified "smells expensive" and nothing else. But "it's marketing" is not the distinguishing criticism people think it is, because the alternative on offer is also marketing.

What's actually changed in the product

The current generation is measurably more serious than the 2008 vintage. Perfumers get credited. Concentrations are higher. Briefs are less obviously written by a licensing committee. Some of these are collaborations in the real sense — the artist in the room, making decisions — rather than a name rented for a season.

Which brings it back to the only question worth asking about any fragrance, celebrity or niche or designer: did somebody decide anything?

You can smell the answer. A composition where choices were made has edges — a material that's slightly too much, a transition that's abrupt, something that won't please everyone. A composition assembled to test well has none of that, and it doesn't matter whose face is on the box.

How to actually judge one

Smell it without the name, if you can manage it. Get a sample, wear it for a day, and notice whether you'd have been interested if it had arrived unlabelled from a house you'd never heard of.

Most won't survive that test. Some will, and they'll be better than things you paid four times as much for. We wrote about the cost of buying fragrance you haven't smelled — the reverse error is refusing to smell something because of what's printed on it, and it's cheaper but no less limiting.

Chapter One is currently sold out. Join the list to be notified first.

From Chapter One

All eight

Keep reading

Every essay